I was reflecting on what Hindu extremism really means—isn't it about renouncing material attachments and quietly walking the path of a sannyasi? Not like Yogi Adityanath. If you are a true Sanatani then you will throw Yogi Adityanath, fake spiritual gurus and baba's out of social structure for their hypocrisy by using Sanatani concept "Tadipar". But we do exactly opposite we make "Tadipar" people our leaders. That's why, Hinduism feels nothing but a grand
performance—loud, aggressive, and rooted in hatred. When did that shift happen?
Is it possible that we’re taking lessons of Hinduism and Indian culture from those
who neither understand nor embody them? If you control a person’s god, you
control the person. You shape minds—through stories, through culture, and
through scriptures. Do I really need to explain this? Maybe, like our minds, our spiritual institutions have also been hacked.
The case of Lt. Samuel Kamalesan, a Christian army officer dismissed for refusing to enter a temple's inner sanctum. The irony? We’ve spent centuries barring Dalits from even stepping near temples, purifying temples with goumutra and gangajal if they do. But now we’re forcing a Christian to enter the sanctum? Are we turning into Islam 2.0? If a Christian enters a temple, do we skip the cow urine purification this time? Hinduism can be laughable. If you’re lower caste, you're barred. But if you convert to Christianity or Islam, we’ll drag you in. Is this about faith or something else?
The underlying message is clear: hate them, don't work with them and don't trust them. Keep your focus on hindu khatre me hai and don't ask about any other issues. Dalit hatred. Muslim hatred. Christian
hatred. Sikh hatred. Jain hatred. Zoroastrians (Parsis) hatred is next. What are we practicing religion or religious competition? Hatred,
hatred, hatred... And then we preach non-violence, kindness, and compassion? One thing is certain: fear and isolation are classic tools of a
toxic, narcissistic mind. They use them to assert dominance and control. When those
same tactics are applied at a socio-political level, what else can we call it
but institutional narcissism?
We love reducing people to slurs. We’ve normalized dehumanizing entire communities, turning identity into insults. We call Indian Christians “rice bag converts,” Ambedkarites “nila kabutar,” Muslims “mulla” or “katuwa,” Sikhs “Khalistani”, Northeast "Chinki's" and let's not even talk slurs used for women's and their body parts. What are we—school bullies with national stage? If you compartmentalize people like that, then you are not looking at them as human beings anymore.
Religion shift in
India was never about conversion—it was self-respect and dignity. The same
self-respect that led Dr. Ambedkar to embrace Buddhism. The same reason Bhagat
Singh rejected religion. Why Lal Bahadur Shastri dropped his caste name—and
perhaps paid for it with his life. Why Swami Vivekananda questioned Hindu
orthodoxy. Why Jyotiba Phule rebelled against upper-caste Brahmin dominance. How
many more examples do we need?
Have you noticed that when people study all religions rationally, they often end up calling Muslims and Christians more humanitarian than Hindus? You can't say it's unholy to kill cows but holy to kill lower caste humans. That is nothing but ethnic cleansing. I don’t like any Abrahamic religion, including Judaism. And to me Hinduism has same MO as Abrahamic religions. So then, why are we conditioned to hate Islam and Christianity only and not Judaism. Not only that but we are taught to hate Buddhism, and Sikhism although they have Indian origin itself? On the other hand, we are taught to support Jews, Judaism and Israel? Is it just antisemitism avoidance—or is there something deeper? Is our tax money quietly supporting Israel? First the Mughals taxed us, then the British, and now we keep getting hit with new taxes—yet there’s no real growth. So where is all that money going? Are we taking our country on the path of Isarel to become barren land who is constantly fighting some or the other war since the beginning of religion?
After Manipur, now Meghalaya is under the media lens—and not in a good way. Looks like mainstream Media is running smear campaign against Meghalaya. Smearing reputations is a classic tactic when you want to destabilize a person or region. Patricia Mukhim, renowned journalist, posted on her social media: "Don't bring your chaos to Meghalaya." Smart woman—she knows only evil thrives in chaos. It'll be interesting to see how the peaceful Khasi and other tribal communities push back against what feels like UP's dominance. Why UP and not Delhi? Indian politics is shaped in UP—it sends the most MPs to Parliament and drives the national agenda. And yet, despite this power, UP, Bihar, and Jharkhand remain some of the under develop regions, forcing people to migrate to Maharashtra, the South, and elsewhere just to survive. That’s what happens when you're focused only on consumption, not creation and giving back to community. Eventually, there’s nothing left to consume, and the cycle of migration and decay repeats elsewhere. Isn't this parasitic behavior?
Any country in the world where religious politics takes center stage, growth suffers—and India is no different. The stagnation of UP, Bihar, and Jharkhand is proof of that. Perhaps this mindset of consuming and not creating is why India ranks low on the hunger index, poverty, corruption, low wages, twisted corporate ethics, poor GDP per capita—even behind many African nations—and also lacks real tech progress. We’re too busy looting, stopping growth of others instead of helping and growing together.
On the other hand, states that resist this mindset and religious politics tend to thrive. Meghalaya recently became plastic- and fertilizer-free and was named the cleanest state. Tamil Nadu, once struggling, saw real progress after the Dravidian movement. Makes me think, the language debate isn’t just about language—it’s about resisting UP’s dominance, upper-caste supremacy, systemic control and slavery. And no, this doesn’t mean I hate the North or upper-caste Hindus. I know one thing when you hate something or someone you created an enemy. Hatred only spread hatred which brings destruction that's why I don’t have strong emotions like that to anything—I just see things as they are. That does not mean I am all about love and light as my faith isn't blind. Change can also be brought without hatred and chaos but for that you will have to do the real work, acknowledge everything, and accept the truth. Surely our leaders don't want to do that.
Let’s talk about the new marriage law that requires parental consent—as if all families are safe, supportive, and non-toxic. In reality,
this law seems designed to reinforce the caste system and ensure people marry
within their community. Marriage, in this context, isn’t about love—it’s a
political tool. Then we question why Indian marriages are failing and blame women's for not being submissive enough instead of addressing real issue. Historically, community-based marriages served to control
wealth, inheritance, and power within bloodlines. It was never about purity,
only greed and power. Certainly, like in Islam, our leaders too seem to ignore science.
This obsession with preserving the caste system and enforcing marriage within
the community is not just regressive—it’s outright unscientific.
Homo sapiens are the last surviving human species—so yes, we’re already on the path to extinction. If you’ve read Sapiens by Yuval Noah Harari, you’ll understand. What we call “growth” is just money, but for the universe, growth means constant change. No genetic variation, no evolution—no future. Nature is simple: if you don’t grow, you’re thrown out of the ecosystem. Marrying within closed communities increases the risk of genetic deformities and diseases. So, we’re sacrificing our future generations just to hoard wealth and power within community. But what future are we even preserving—one that’s genetically deform or a “Hindu Rashtra” without people? It is self-destruction.
Adani is back in the news—this time tied to a plane crash in Ahmedabad. Maybe now’s we should dig into Boeing’s history. Honestly, my nervous system feels shot now. I wanted to write about Kashmir real history as nothing changed after removal of article 370. Ohh wait something did—other state people were able to buy land in Kashmir. So, what now Upper caste Supremacy is about land grabbing? Where do we see the similar pattern? Hasdev forest and Andaman Island land grabbing disguise as development. No wonder our neighboring countries befriend others but not us!
I wanted to forget about all this and work on my project, maybe even rest a bit. But it’s like our leaders want us to be angry about the past or fearful about the future. What growth are we even talking about? When “Hindu Rashtra” is the only priority and “Hindu khatre mein hai” is the default narrative, no wonder there’s no technological advancements.
When I say most of India’s problems trace back to the stupid need of holding upper-caste Supremacy it’s not a baseless argument. They’re so focused on control and dominance they can’t even see the damage they’re doing to the country and people or maybe thats what they want. If this is your country and you claim to love it, why are you then breaking it by multiple cuts? People will always try to hold on to power but why are others so obedient? I don't say all this lightly I do my research you should do too. Don't just sit there and obey!
Happy Sunday!
0 Comments