Hello Again! Looks like I disappeared again! I know many of you might be thinking the same since it's been two weeks since I last posted an article. Well, greetings to you all! I am here. If you follow me on social media, you already know that I wasn’t keeping well, and that’s why the break. I needed time to recover, heal, become stronger, and then return to my regular life, which includes writing.
Today, I’d like to introduce you to a part of my
personality. Truth be told, even when I’m not unwell, I may still disappear
from time to time. That’s just who I am. Strategic solitude and peace is extremely empowering to me.
It’s during these quiet moments that I regain my strength, restore my energy, channel my thoughts,
and gain new ideas. This is also the prime reason why I keep my social media
exposure limited—the digital world feels overwhelmingly noisy with unnecessary
information and chatter.
Although there are many topics I’ve promised to write about
in future articles, today we’re not going to talk about any of them. Why? Well,
first of all, I just recovered from an illness, so I don’t have the energy to
do extensive thinking. And secondly, I need to answer some questions raised by
readers and friends. It’s important to address these questions before we move
forward in discussing the complex topics of India’s social fabric, current
politics, and democracy.
Let’s dive in!
"Are you anti-Brahmin?"
After my last article, a reader commented, “Looks like you
are anti-Brahmin.”
First of all, I’m sorry you felt that way. It’s absolutely
normal to feel so, but here’s something you need to know—I am not against any
community or religion. However, I am against Brahminism—the ideology and
religious dogma associated with it—not Brahmins as individuals. I’ve explained
this distinction in detail in one of my previous articles, which you can refer
to here.
Most importantly, Brahminism is not the only ideology I
critique. I critique many groups, including Ambedkarites. Interestingly,
Ambedkarites are the only group that has taken my criticism positively. While
they don’t give me any credit or acknowledgment for my work, I’m happy to see
the results. For me, the greater purpose matters more than recognition or fame.
My reasons for criticizing Ambedkarites are significant,
some of which are personal and connected to my family—this will need another
article to elaborate. One of the main reasons is that, although they read Dr.
Ambedkar’s literature and are arguably the most aware, they still fail to truly
understand Dr Ambedkar. If they struggle with this, imagine the plight of those who
don’t read his works at all!
Let’s admit it: motivation is essential for growth, but criticism is equally crucial for change. Change is the only constant in this vast universe—without it, everything stagnates and eventually dies.
"Disagreeing without understanding?"
This comment came from a dear friend: “Well tried, though I
don’t agree with all of it due to a lack of understanding on this topic.” At
first glance, this comment may seem harmless, but there’s a significant issue
here. While I realize that dissecting it publicly might make him feel a bit
flustered, I believe it’s important to address it for a broader understanding.
Here’s the problem: If you lack understanding of a topic,
how can you have a firm stance like disagreeing? When you lack understanding of
a subject, you simply lack the foundation to make a judgment, whether it’s
agreement or disagreement. Saying, “I lack understanding, but I disagree” is
logically inconsistent.
There’s a larger group of people who make comments like this. To them, I say: Don’t. It’s important to develop a proper understanding of a subject before forming opinions, especially when it concerns critical topics like the Indian social fabric. Ignoring it simply because it feels uncomfortable, negative or triggering, will never lead India to progress. This issue exists because large number of people do not want to look at it. Forget about competing with global powers like China and USA—this path will only lead us toward becoming the next Pakistan.
"Why don’t you critique Islam or Christianity?"
This topic needs a detailed article. For now, let me make
one thing clear: I do not hate Islam, Christianity, or any other religion.
Hatred only brings destruction and chaos to societies.
Currently, a significant portion of the population harbors
hostility toward Islam and Christianity due to extensive brainwashing. Many
would be ready to harm Muslims or Christians if asked, without any remorse and
guilt. The only group that has stayed away from this madness is the Ambedkarite’s.
I firmly believe that disrespectful comments about Dr. Ambedkar, recently made by Home Minister Amit Shah, was a strategic attempt to provoke Ambedkarites into chaos. Why? Because democracy transitions into dictatorship only when chaos prevails, and entire population jump into madness. Maharashtra is where Ambedkarites are most active. How can we forget that infamous Bhima Koregaon incident happened under the watch of Dendra Fadnavis government.
Manipur, Sambhal, and Bahraich—despite these issues, Ambedkarites have managed to stay away. However, the Parbhani incident might push them over the edge. If they jump in fully, then I fear the outcome. We might see major unrest in country. Ultimately paving a way to what current government’s aims for.
"Which religion do I follow?"
I follow Buddhism—not in a dogmatic way. After studying
various religious philosophies, I found myself resonating most with Buddhism.
It has also helped me understand the deities and figures in Hinduism, so I have
no reason to disrespect or reject these deities and figurines.
In fact, many ardent followers of Hinduism unknowingly worship Buddhist deities more than some Buddhist followers themselves. Therefore, Hindus must stop disrespecting Buddhist monks and Buddhism, as such behavior stems from a lack of understanding and awareness. Although Buddhism originated in India, the historical damage and injustice inflicted upon it has been immense.
Lastly, although I follow Buddhism, I wouldn’t call myself a ‘Buddhist.’ I see myself as a human being experiencing this world, with the goal of making it a better place and leaving it better than I found it. Buddhism teaches us to be free from ideologies and identities (a concept called Anatta), allowing us to see things clearly, without the bias of any lens. Thats also the reason I am not with any party or specific group. I am independent thinker and writer.
I hope this article has answered many of the questions my
readers have had about me and my perspectives. Until the next article—adios and Happy Christmas!
0 Comments